Cute examples, but the biggie is the Republican position that reduction in the deficit should be exclusively by reduction in expenditures, not one cent more in tax revenue, indeed that tax revenue need to be reduced even more by extending the provisions of the "Tax Cuts for the Rich and Deficits Act of 2017."
Oh, and one mor thing, JD. "Protectionist" tariffs don't harm just consumers, they hard exporters, too because tariffs push up the value of the dollar.
Cute examples, but the biggie is the Republican position that reduction in the deficit should be exclusively by reduction in expenditures, not one cent more in tax revenue, indeed that tax revenue need to be reduced even more by extending the provisions of the "Tax Cuts for the Rich and Deficits Act of 2017."
Oh, and one mor thing, JD. "Protectionist" tariffs don't harm just consumers, they hard exporters, too because tariffs push up the value of the dollar.